Resolution Statement 02212-17 A man v Express.co.uk
1. A man complained
on behalf of Levi Bellfield to the Independent Press Standards Organisation
that Express.co.uk breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of
Practice in an article headlined "Yorkshire ripper ‘partied with Ian
Huntley & Levi Bellfield in sick celebration of arrest'”, published on 12
2. The article
reported that Levi Bellfield had attended a party in the cell of another inmate
at HMP Frankland in Durham.
3. The complainant said that Mr Bellfield had not attended such a party, and that the article was inaccurate. In support of his position, he provided a statement from prison staff, which said that there was no evidence to substantiate the article under complaint.
4. The publication said that it had relied on a source for the story. It said that this source had provided information in the past, and is considered to be reliable and credible. The publication said that it had also contacted the Ministry of Justice, but that it had denied the story, which is its usual response.
Relevant Code Provisions
5. Clause 1 (Accuracy)
i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.
ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and — where appropriate — an apology published. In cases involving IPSO, due prominence should be as required by the regulator.
iii) A fair opportunity to reply to significant inaccuracies should be given, when reasonably called for.
iv) The Press, while free to editorialise and campaign, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.
6. The complaint
was not resolved through direct correspondence between the parties. IPSO
therefore began an investigation into the matter.
7. Following IPSO’s
intervention, the publication offered to add the following footnote to the
Following publication of this article, Mr Bellfield has
contacted the publication to deny that he attended a party in Mr Sutcliffe’s
cell. The Ministry of Justice denied that the party had taken place, and the
custody officer on duty on the day in question has said that there was no
evidence to suggest that Mr Bellfield attended any such party
8. The complainant
said that this resolved the matter to his satisfaction.
9. As the complaint
was successfully mediated, the Complaints Committee did not make a
determination as to whether there had been any breach of the Code.
Date complaint received: 23/03/2017
Date complaint concluded by IPSO: 12/06/2017
Back to ruling listing