Resolution Statement – 03148-21 Williams v The Times
Summary of Complaint
1. Nicola Williams complained to the Independent Press
Standards Organisation that The Times breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the
Editors’ Code of Practice in an article headlined “Doctors who mix up sex and
gender 'putting patients at risk'”, published on 3 April 2021.
2. The article reported on new research which suggested that
“Doctors who deliberately confuse sex and gender are putting the treatment of
some patients at risk”. It noted that “Problems can arise in the appropriate
treatment of transgender patients who may be on long-term hormone therapy with
oestrogen or testosterone to change their biological sex.”. It also stated that
“confusion over sex and gender reflects arguments about changes to questions to
be asked as part of Scotland’s census next year….For the first time Scots will
be asked three questions relating to their sex, trans status and sexual
orientation”. It reported that “Some statisticians [say] that this could
distort figures on issues such as illnesses specific to men and women”.
3. The article appeared online in a substantially similar
format.
4. The complainant said that the article was inaccurate in
claiming that problems may arise in the case of transgender patients treated
with “oestrogen or testosterone to change their biological sex”. She said that
such patients cannot change their biological sex, only their sex
characteristics. Further, she also said it was misleading to report that
“statisticians [say] that [the three Scottish census questions] could distort
figures on issues such as illnesses specific to men and women”. The complainant
said that statisticians had no problem with the new questions, but rather took
issue with the guidance provided on how to answer them.
5. On receipt of the complaint, the publication amended the
online article to take into account the complainant’s comments.
6. The complainant expressed a concern that these amendments
had not been recorded in a footnote correction or clarification.
Relevant Code Provisions
7. Clause 1 (Accuracy)
i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate,
misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not
supported by the text.
ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or
distortion must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and — where
appropriate — an apology published. In cases involving IPSO, due prominence
should be as required by the regulator.
iv) The Press, while free to editorialise and campaign, must
distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.
Mediated Outcome
8. The complaint was not resolved through direct
correspondence between the parties. IPSO therefore began an investigation into
the matter.
9. During IPSO’s investigation the newspaper offered to
publish the following correction in print in its corrections column and as a
footnote to the online article:
“In an article on the 2021 census we wrongly referred to
“transgender patients who may be on long-term therapy … to change their
biological sex” (Doctors who mix up sex and gender ‘put patients at risk’,
April 3). Hormone therapy cannot change
biological sex. We also reported that
statisticians were concerned that census questions on sex, trans status and
sexual orientation “could distort figures on issues such as illnesses specific
to men and women”. We have been asked to
make clear that the concerns expressed related specifically to guidance that
the sex question could be answered with a gender identity”.
10. The complainant said that this would resolve the matter
to her satisfaction.
11. As the complaint was successfully mediated, the
Complaints Committee did not make a determination as to whether there had been
any breach of the Code.
Date complaint received: 03/04/2021
Date complaint concluded by IPSO: 27/05/2021
Back to ruling listing