Complaint 04582-18 Johnson v Daily Star
Summary of complaint
1. David
Johnson, acting on behalf of Adam Johnson, complained to the Independent Press
Standards Organisation that the Daily Star breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the
Editors’ Code of Practice in an article headlined “Footie perv Adam ‘will play abroad’”,
published on 2 March 2018.
2. The
complainant said that it was inaccurate to refer to his son as a “paedophile”
or a “nonce”. He said the term “paedophile” described a “male predator who had
sexual attraction towards prepubescent children”; his son was not a paedophile.
3. The
newspaper denied that it had breached the Code. It noted that Adam Johnson had
been convicted of sexual activity with a child; it was not therefore inaccurate
to use the word “paedophile” to describe him. It also did not consider that it
was inaccurate to describe him as a “pervert”, which referred to a person whose
sexual behaviour is regarded as abnormal and unacceptable.
Relevant Code provisions
4. Clause 1 (Accuracy)
i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.
ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or
distortion must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and — where
appropriate — an apology published. In cases involving IPSO, due prominence
should be as required by the regulator.
Mediated outcome
5. The
newspaper offered to remove the article from its website, and it agreed to
contact the complainant if it needed to verify information which it received
about Adam Johnson.
6. The
complainant accepted the newspaper’s offer as a resolution to the complaint.
7. As the
complaint was successfully mediated, the Complaints Committee did not make a
determination as to whether there had been any breach of the Code.
Date complaint received: 20/03/2018
Date complaint concluded by IPSO: 18/07/2018