Resolution Statement 04905-19
Markey v dailyrecord.co.uk
Summary of Complaint
1. John Markey complained to the
Independent Press Standards Organisation that dailyrecord.co.uk breached Clause
1 (Accuracy) and Clause 2 (Privacy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice in an
article headlined “Trio involved in promoting illegal Glasgow drug club
unmasked”, published on 23 June 2019.
2. The article reported that the
complainants was part of a group who has been “involved in advertising
drug-fueled weekly events” at a local club night. It reported that the complainant
specifically “promotes the unlicensed night-time activities”. The article also
stated that the complainant was not available for comment.
3. The complainant said that the
article inaccurately reported information that he was involved in illegal
activity, in breach of Clause 1 (Accuracy). He stated that the relationship he
shared with the club night was minimal and he was in no way responsible for the
events or for any illegal activity. Furthermore, he also said that, contrary to
the article's claims, no attempt was made to contact him. He also said that the
article intruded into his privacy and this could not be justified in the public
interest.
4. The publication did not accept
that there has been a breach of the Code. It did not accept that it was
inaccurate to report that the complainant was partly responsible for the club
night as its Facebook page listed him as Admin and Moderator. It also claimed that
the reporter telephoned the complainant and visited three addresses registered
to a ‘John Markey’.
Relevant Code Provisions
Clause 1 (Accuracy)
i) The Press must take care not to
publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including
headlines not supported by the text.
ii) A significant inaccuracy,
misleading statement or distortion must be corrected, promptly and with due
prominence, and — where appropriate — an apology published. In cases involving
IPSO, due prominence should be as required by the regulator.
iii) A fair opportunity to reply to
significant inaccuracies should be given, when reasonably called for.
iv) The Press, while free to
editorialise and campaign, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture
and fact.
Clause 2 (Privacy)
i) Everyone is entitled to respect
for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence,
including digital communications.
ii) Editors will be expected to
justify intrusions into any individual's private life without consent. In
considering an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy, account will be
taken of the complainant's own public disclosures of information and the extent
to which the material complained about is already in the public domain or will
become so.
iii) It is unacceptable to
photograph individuals, without their consent, in public or private places where
there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Mediated Outcome
5. The complaint was not resolved
through direct correspondence between the parties. IPSO therefore began an
investigation into the matter.
6. During IPSO’s investigation, the
newspaper offered to add a statement from the complainant, to the article,
putting his position on the claims on record.
7. The complainant said that this
resolved the matter to his satisfaction.
8. As the complaint was
successfully mediated, the Complaints Committee did not make a determination as
to whether there had been any breach of the Code.
Date complaint received: 23/06/2019
Date complaint concluded by IPSO:
02/09/2019