· Decision of the Complaints Committee 06076-15 O’Connell v Daily Express
Summary of
complaint
1. John O’Connell complained to the Independent Press
Standards Organisation that the Daily Express breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of
the Editors’ Code of Practice in an article headlined “They’ve killed, raped,
and violated children, but EU demands evil lags be given the vote”, published
on 5 October 2015. It was published in the print newspaper with the headline
“Outrage as EU set to enforce prisoners’ vote.”
2. The article reported that the European Court of
Justice (ECJ) was shortly to rule that prisoners be allowed to vote, despite
the UK Government’s previously rejecting such a measure.
3. The complainant said that the headline reference to
the European Union (EU) was inaccurate, as it was the ECJ that was going to
make the decision (as explained in the article), and the two bodies are
unconnected.
4. The newspaper did not accept any breach of the
Editors’ Code. It said that the ECJ is an EU institution; the reference was
therefore not inaccurate.
Relevant Code Provisions
5. Clause 1 (Accuracy)
i) The press must take care not to publish inaccurate,
misleading or distorted information, including pictures.
ii) A significant inaccurate, misleading statement or
distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence,
and – where appropriate – an apology published.
Findings of the Committee
6. The ECJ is one of the institutions of the EU, and the
article had made clear the specific body which was making the decision. The
headline reference to the EU was not inaccurate. There was no failure to take
care over the accuracy of the article, and the Committee did not identify any
significant inaccuracies which would require correction under the Code.
Conclusions
7. The complaint was not upheld.
Remedial Action Required
N/A
Date complaint received: 05/10/2015