Decision of the Complaints Committee 06756-17 Clift v
Berwickshire News
Summary of Complaint
1. Michael Clift
complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation that the
Berwickshire News breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) and Clause 12 (Discrimination)
of the Editors’ Code of Practice in an article headlined “Candidates from the
local council election”, published on 27 April 2017.
2. The article was
a collection of profiles of candidates who were contesting two Scottish Borders
Council wards, in mid and East Berwickshire. Each profile contained an image of
the candidate, alongside a short piece which had been written by them, which
detailed their policies and previous experience.
3. The article
reported that “all candidates were given the opportunity to convince you they
deserve your vote and 11 of the 13 took up that opportunity”. The article did
not contain a profile from the complainant, and it said that “Michael Clift
from Cockburnspath is standing as an independent in the East Berwickshire
ward”.
4. The complainant said that the newspaper had made no
attempt to contact him. Therefore he said that it was inaccurate for the
article to report that he had been given an opportunity to submit his profile
for publication. He further said that the article had inaccurately reported
that he was from Cockburnpath, when in fact he was from Coldingham.
5. The newspaper did not accept a breach of the Code. It
provided a copy of an earlier print article, dated 6 April, which had also
reported on the upcoming Council election, and which had stated: “Candidates
are invited to send details for a profile ahead of May 4’s election”. It said that when the complainant did not
respond to this, the newspaper had made a further attempt to contact him via
Facebook messenger; the newspaper provided a screenshot of the message which
was sent to the complainant on 19 April, which invited him to submit his
profile for publication.
6. The newspaper
noted that the complainant was from Cockburnspath, rather than Coldingham, and
published a correction on this point, which stated:
In last week’s Berwickshire news, we said that Michael
Clift, an East Berwickshire ward candidate is from Cockburnspath, but he
actually lives in Coldingham. We apologise for the error.
7. The complainant
said that he had not seen the 6 April article, nor had he received the message
which the newspaper had sent him over Facebook messenger, although he accepted
that the screenshot provided by the newspaper had shown that the newspaper had
made an attempt to contact him directly.
Relevant Code Provisions
8. Clause 1
(Accuracy)
i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate,
misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not
supported by the text.
ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or
distortion must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and — where
appropriate — an apology published. In cases involving IPSO, due prominence
should be as required by the regulator.
iii) A fair opportunity to reply to significant
inaccuracies should be given, when reasonably called for.
iv) The Press, while free to editorialise and campaign,
must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.
Clause 12 (Discrimination)
i) The press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative
reference to an individual's, race, colour, religion, sex, gender identity,
sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability.
ii) Details of an individual's race, colour, religion,
gender identity, sexual orientation, physical or mental illness or disability
must be avoided unless genuinely relevant to the story.
Findings of the Committee
9. The newspaper had published an earlier article, which
contained an open request to all candidates to submit a profile for
publication, and it had also sent a direct message to the complainant on
Facebook. While the Committee noted the complainant’s position that he had not
been aware of the attempts made by the newspaper to contact him, it was not
inaccurate for the article to report that he had not taken up an opportunity to
submit a candidate profile for publication. The Committee did not consider that
any inaccuracy relating to where the complainant lived, was significant, in
circumstances where the article had made clear which Council ward the
complainant was contesting. The Committee also acknowledged that the newspaper
had published a prominent correction, promptly, in order to address this point.
There was no breach of Clause 1.
10. Clause 12 protects identified individuals mentioned
by the press against discrimination on the basis of their race, colour,
religion, gender, sexual orientation or any physical or mental illness or
disability. The complaint did not engage the terms of this Clause.
Conclusion
The complaint was not upheld
Remedial Action Required
N/A
Date complaint received: 06/05/2017
Date decision issued: 26/06/2017