Resolution
Statement – 10206-22 Forde & Doyle v The Argus
Summary
of Complaint
1. Reis
Forde and Sinead Doyle complained to the Independent Press Standards
Organisation that The Argus breached Clause 1 (Accuracy), Clause 2 (Privacy),
Clause 12 (Discrimination), and Clause 14 (Confidential sources) of the
Editors’ Code of Practice in the articles headlined “Teenager died at Airbnb
flat after taking drugs”, “It was a 'significant lapse of care'”, and “Mother's
formal complaint to police over daughter's death” published on 18 March 2022,
21 March 2022, and 23 March 2022 respectively.
2. The
articles reported on the death of a 17-year-old girl following a night spent in
an Airbnb flat, and the subsequent inquest into her death. The first article
reported that the inquest heard that the girl had been at the Airbnb with Reis
Forde, one of the complainants, and that he had awoken the next day and
“noticed she was sleeping in ‘a strange position’”. The article further
reported that it had been heard at the inquest that Mr Forde “made several
calls on his mobile in the morning of February 25, including several to Sinead
Doyle”.
3. The
second article reported further on the inquest and stated that the girl “had
taken a cocktail of alcohol, heroin and cocaine after spending the night with
her boyfriend Reis Forde, 26, a convicted drug dealer”. The third article
further reported on the inquest and also described the complainant, Mr Forde,
as the “boyfriend” of the girl.
4. The
articles also appeared online in substantially the same format as their print
counterparts under the headlines, “Teenager died after taking cocktail of
alcohol, heroin and cocaine”, “Teenager's inquest told of a 'significant lapse
of care'”, and “Grieving mother makes formal complaint against police after
death of her daughter” published on 17 March 2022, 21 March 2022, and 22 March
2022 respectively. The second and third online articles also described Mr Forde
as the “boyfriend” of the girl.
5. The
complainants said that the second and third print and online articles were
inaccurate in breach of Clause 1 to describe Mr Forde as the boyfriend of the
girl. They said that they had both explained during the inquest that this was
not the case.
6. The
complainants further said that they considered the articles had also breached
Clauses 2, 12, and 14. The complainants concerns regarding Clause 2 related to
photographs of Ms Doyle, however these photographs did not appear in any of the
articles under complaint. Further, the complainants did not expand on their
concerns in relation to Clauses 12 and 14.
7. The
publication did not accept a breach of the Editors’ Code. In relation to Clause
1, it provided the coroner’s verdict which contained a section that stated:
“She [the girl] told her friend that she was in a relationship with a man who
was known as Rex, but his name was Reis Forde and that they had been in a
relationship since January”. It said that it did not consider the difference
between the phrases “in a relationship” and “boyfriend” to be significantly
different.
Relevant
Code Provisions
Clause 1
(Accuracy)
i) The
Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted
information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.
ii) A
significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion must be corrected,
promptly and with due prominence, and — where appropriate — an apology
published. In cases involving IPSO, due prominence should be as required by the
regulator.
iii) A
fair opportunity to reply to significant inaccuracies should be given, when
reasonably called for.
iv) The
Press, while free to editorialise and campaign, must distinguish clearly
between comment, conjecture and fact.
Clause 2
(Privacy)*
i)
Everyone is entitled to respect for their private and family life, home,
physical and mental health, and correspondence, including digital
communications.
ii)
Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual's private
life without consent. In considering an individual's reasonable expectation of
privacy, account will be taken of the complainant's own public disclosures of
information and the extent to which the material complained about is already in
the public domain or will become so.
iii) It
is unacceptable to photograph individuals, without their consent, in public or
private places where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Clause
12 (Discrimination)
i) The
press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative reference to an individual's race,
colour, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation or to any physical
or mental illness or disability.
ii)
Details of an individual's race, colour, religion, gender identity, sexual
orientation, physical or mental illness or disability must be avoided unless
genuinely relevant to the story.
Clause
14 (Confidential sources)
Journalists
have a moral obligation to protect confidential sources of information.
Mediated
Outcome
8. The
complaint was not resolved through direct correspondence between the parties.
IPSO therefore began an investigation into the matter.
9. During
IPSO’s investigation the publication offered to remove the words “her
boyfriend” from all the articles they appeared in.
10. The
complainants said that this would resolve the matter to their satisfaction.
11. As
the complaint was successfully mediated, the Complaints Committee did not make
a determination as to whether there had been any breach of the Code.
Date
complaint received: 18/06/2022
Date complaint concluded by IPSO: 02/11/2022
Back to ruling listing