Decision
of the Complaints Committee – 11103-22 A woman v The Daily Telegraph
Summary
of Complaint
1. A
woman complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation that The Daily
Telegraph breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice in an
article headlined “Star Observer columnist is suspended over conduct claims”,
published on 3 August 2022.
2. The
article reported on the suspension of an Observer columnist “following
allegations over his conduct in the wake of a row about trans rights”. It said
his “weekly column has been put on hold while the allegations are
investigated”.
3. The
article contained a quote from Guardian News and Media (GNM), the publisher of
the Observer newspaper, which stated that the columnist “had agreed to ‘step
back from work’ and will ‘cooperate with the company’s ongoing investigation’”,
but that “it gave no further detail on the nature of the investigation”. It
also stated that the columnist, when contacted by the publication, had said: “I
am afraid I cannot say anything until the inquiry is over.”
4. The
article also appeared online in substantially the same terms under the headline
“Star Observer columnist suspended after trans rights row”. It also contained a
quote from a woman who was said to have complained about the columnist in 2018.
5. The
complainant said that the article was inaccurate in breach of Clause 1. She
said that it was inaccurate to report that the columnist had been suspended
because of a “trans rights row”. She believed that his suspension was due to
different allegations which had been made against him. She said she was one of
a number of individuals who had made such allegations to GNM, but that for
various reasons she now considered herself to be “estranged” from GNM’s
investigation. The complainant said that a separate publication had published a
statement from GNM which set out the reasons for the investigation. The other
publication’s article reported that the columnist had “agreed to step back from
work for a period of time and cooperate with the company's ongoing
investigation".
6. The
publication did not accept a breach of the Code. It said that the article
accurately reported: that the columnist had been suspended; that neither the
columnist nor GNM had revealed the nature of the allegations; that the investigation
came after public allegations regarding “the cancellation of transphobes” had
been made by the barrister named in the article; and that the barrister had
also invited others to share any complaints they may have about the columnist.
The publication also said that the separate article referred to by the
complainant did not say what the allegations that were being investigated by
GNM were and noted the complainant’s position that she was “estranged” from the
investigation.
7. The
publication said that it had no knowledge of the nature of the allegations
being investigated by the GNM – either at the time of publication or subsequent
to the complaint. It also said that the article did not give the impression
that the columnist’s suspension was due to “trans issues”. It said that the
article reported that this was in the wake of the barrister’s public comments
regarding trans and women’s rights, following which the barrister had forwarded
unspecified allegations made by a number of individuals to GNM.
Relevant
Code Provisions
Clause 1
(Accuracy)
i) The
Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted
information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.
ii) A
significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion must be corrected,
promptly and with due prominence, and — where appropriate — an apology
published. In cases involving IPSO, due prominence should be as required by the
regulator.
iii) A
fair opportunity to reply to significant inaccuracies should be given, when
reasonably called for.
iv) The
Press, while free to editorialise and campaign, must distinguish clearly
between comment, conjecture and fact.
Findings
of the Committee
8. The
Committee first noted the article’s description of the reasoning behind GNM’s
investigation. It had reported that the columnist “had agreed to ‘step back
from work’ and will ‘cooperate with the company’s ongoing investigation’”. This
same statement was included in the other article which the complainant had said
was accurate in its description of the investigation.
9. The
complainant had said that the article was inaccurate because the columnist had
not been suspended over a “trans rights row” – however, the Committee
considered that the article did not report this. The Committee was clear that
the term “after” (and other terms with a similar meaning) could, in some
circumstances, indicate a causal link between two events. However, that was not
the case in this instance. The first paragraph of the article reported that the
columnist’s suspension followed “allegations over his conduct” and that this
had occurred “in the wake of”, and therefore after a row regarding “trans
rights” rather than as a result of that issue – which the complainant did not
dispute. The article also stated that GNM had given “no further detail on the
nature of the investigation” and that the columnist had said he was unable to
provide a comment when contacted by the publication. The Committee also noted
that the complainant had said that she was “estranged” from GNM’s
investigation, and was not complaining on behalf of GNM. The Committee was not
provided with any evidence from either party which confirmed the basis for the
investigation.
10. The
Committee concluded that the article did not claim that the columnist’s
suspension had arisen from the “row about trans rights”. In these circumstances, and in particular
where the complainant had said she was estranged from the GNM investigation,
the grounds of complaint raised did not demonstrate an inaccuracy within the
article, and there was no breach of Clause 1.
Conclusions
11. The
complaint was not upheld.
Remedial
Action Required
12. N/A
Date
complaint received: 05/10/2022
Date complaint concluded by IPSO: 02/12/2022
Back to ruling listing