Resolution Statement: Complaint 00242-16 Blomfield v The Sun
-
Complaint Summary
Paul Blomfield MP complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation that The Sun breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice in an article headlined “As Cameron declares war on sink estates, we visit Britain’s worst”, published on the newspaper’s website on 10 January 2016.
-
-
Published date
26th May 2016
-
Outcome
Resolved - IPSO mediation
-
Code provisions
1 Accuracy
-
Published date
Resolution Statement: Complaint 00242-16 Blomfield v The Sun
Summary of
complaint:
1. Paul Blomfield
MP complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation that The Sun
breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice in an article
headlined “As Cameron declares war on sink estates, we visit Britain’s worst”,
published on the newspaper’s website on 10 January 2016.
2.
The article
focused on the Manor estate in Sheffield, and the complainant said that the
journalist had not visited the estate prior to publication of the article. He
expressed concern that it had used historical quotations which did not reflect
recent improvements to the estate, and that some of the accompanying
photographs showed a different estate in the area.
3.
The newspaper
acknowledged that the journalist had not visited the estate and that archive
material had been used, but did not believe that the article had been
significantly inaccurate or misleading. It removed the article from its
website.
Relevant Code
provisions:
4. Clause 1 (Accuracy)
(i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.
(ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and – where appropriate – an apology published.
(iii) A fair opportunity to reply to significant inaccuracies must be given, when reasonably called for.
(iv) The Press, while free to editorialise and campaign, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.
Mediated
outcome:
5.
The complaint
was not resolved through direct correspondence between the parties. IPSO
therefore began an investigation into the matter.
6. The following correction was agreed between the two parties, for publication on the newspaper’s website:
“Corrections & clarifications: Manor Estate, Sheffield
An article ‘As Cameron declares war on sink estates, we visit Britain’s worst’ (10 January 2016) suggested that a reporter visited the Manor Estate in Sheffield, once described by Roy Hattersley as ‘the worst estate in Britain’. In fact, no representative of The Sun did visit the estate. The article was based on archive material, including the 21 year old Hattersley quote, and did not take into consideration recent improvements. We apologise to residents in the area.”
7. The complainant said that publication of the correction would resolve the matter to his satisfaction.
8. As the complaint was successfully mediated, the Complaints Committee did not make a determination as to whether there had been any breach of the Code.
Date complaint received: 14/03/2016
Date complaint concluded by IPSO: 13/05/2016