Decision
of the Complaints Committee – 07811-22 Centre for Media Monitoring v The Times
Summary
of Complaint
1. The
Centre for Media Monitoring complained to the Independent Press Standards
Organisation that The Times breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code
of Practice in an article headlined “Iran is brazenly playing the West for
suckers”, published on 15 March 2022.
2. The
article, which appeared in print on page 30, was a comment piece about the
West’s relationship with Iran. The columnist argued that Iran had “played the
West for suckers” and that in recent months, Tehran had been “ramping up its
attacks on American and allied interests”. It said: “Charmed by urbane
Iranians, the West has ignored the fact that the regime is dominated by the
Shia “Twelver” sect which believes that bringing about an apocalypse will cause
the Shia messiah, the “Twelfth Imam,” to descend to Earth. With a messianic
agenda of the end of days, the fanatics in Tehran don’t care if a very large
number of Iranians are killed in battle or die of privation.”
3. The
article also appeared online in substantially the same format under the same
headline.
4. The
complainant said that the article breached Clause 1 because it believed that
the article’s claim that the Shia ‘Twelver’ sect [of Islam] believe that
“bringing about an apocalypse will cause the Shia messiah, the ‘Twelfth Imam,’
to descend to Earth” was inaccurate. It said that Shia Twelvers do not believe
they need to bring about an apocalypse to cause the Shia Messiah to descend,
but rather, like most faiths, Shia Twelvers believe in a Messiah at the end of
time, and that there is nothing to suggest bringing about an apocalypse. It
suggested that Shia Twelver scholars would support its position.
5. The
publication said it did not accept a breach of the Code; it said that the point
under complaint was a brief passage in an opinion column, published in the
Comment section, and that the writer was a regular columnist well known for her
strong and often controversial opinions. The publication highlighted that the
column argued that the West had failed to tackle the threat to its interests
posed by the Islamic Republic of Iran, and that the columnist was entitled to
make a summary reference to this contested belief as part of a broader
argument.
6. The
publication argued that, by their nature, religious doctrines were not like
facts; for example, arising from agreed objective data. Religious history was,
even amongst those faiths that might be thought to have a clearer doctrinal
legacy, invariably a history of controversy and disputes between devout
co-believers over what exactly they believed. It said that that was how most of
the world’s sects, denominations and churches came to exist and it was
therefore the case that co-religionists shared beliefs while also understanding
them in different, sometimes contradictory ways.
7. The
publication said that it would not dispute what Twelver scholars and relevant
authorities said they believed, but recognised that there were others such as
“the fanatics in Tehran” whom it said the columnist was referring to in her
opinion column - who appeared, at the very least, to draw different lessons
from the same beliefs, and to live those same beliefs in a different way. The
publication said that it was commonplace in contemporary political scholarship
and debate that “the apocalyptic doctrines of Twelver Shi’ism have acquired a
place in the violent history of the modern Middle East”.
8. The
publication said it had taken care over the accuracy of the article and
provided excerpts from books and scholarly articles on the subject area, which
it stated were from reputable and credible sources. One of those articles
explained that Twelver beliefs focused on the figure of the Twelfth Imam,
Muhammad al-Mahdi (“the Mahdi”), who was claimed in tradition to have
disappeared in 873 CE. The article explained that: “Both the Sunni and Shiite
traditions contain a substantial amount of material about the Mahdi […], and
both traditions elaborate in great detail upon the timeline and future events
that will herald his appearance. This timeline includes the various portents of
the end of the world - a series of events of profound political, economic, religious,
or cosmological significance that will make humankind aware that the world’s
end is near and compel them to prepare for the Mahdi’s return. Naturally, these
messianic traditions have become grist for the mill of radical preachers, who
use messianic language to interpret current events in an apocalyptic fashion
and thereby compel their followers to take radical action in preparation for
the end of days.” A historian of Afghanistan and Iran wrote: “Shia militias and
figures within the Islamic Republic of Iran frame the crises in Iraq and Syria
in their own eschatological terms; the chaos before the return of the Hidden
Imam.” Another book stated “The Twelvers believe Imam Mahdi will require to
lead the forces of righteousness against the forces of evil in a final,
apocalyptic world battle.” The publication said that these passages supported
the columnist’s position.
9. In
response, the complainant commented that proving that a sub-section of Shia
Twelvers held such beliefs was irrelevant. He said that the columnist had
stated that the Shia "Twelver" sect believed this, rather than
certain sections of the sect believed it. The complainant said that just
because a small subset of a group believed something, it did not give the
columnist the right to say that the entire group believed it. The complainant
considered the passage in the article to be racist, a generalisation and an
inaccurate statement.
Relevant
Code Provisions
Clause 1
(Accuracy)
i) The
Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted
information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.
ii) A
significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion must be corrected,
promptly and with due prominence, and — where appropriate — an apology published.
In cases involving IPSO, due prominence should be as required by the regulator.
iii) A
fair opportunity to reply to significant inaccuracies should be given, when
reasonably called for.
iv) The
Press, while free to editorialise and campaign, must distinguish clearly
between comment, conjecture and fact.
Findings
of the Committee
10. The
newspaper produced several examples of texts written by scholars of relevant
subject areas which discussed Twelvers’ beliefs, and the extent to which they
involved apocalyptic scenarios leading up to the return of the Mahdi and how,
in some circumstances, those beliefs had been used by extremists seeking to
motivate “radical action”. While the Committee acknowledged that there would be
a range of views and interpretations in any given sect of a religion, where the
publication was able to provide a number of examples from sources which
explained the association between Twelver beliefs and the apocalypse and how
that had been used by some as a basis for more extremist views, the Committee
was satisfied that the publication had taken care not to publish inaccurate
information. For this reason, there was no breach of Clause 1(i).
11. The
Committee was mindful that the Code should not inhibit freedom of expression,
particularly in areas where there is debate. The complainant appeared to accept
that there were some Shia Twelvers who did hold the beliefs referenced in the
article but said that the article did not make clear these views were held by a
section of the faith rather than all Shia Twelvers. However, the Committee was
conscious of the challenges of summarising religious doctrine - particularly
where, as here, there would often be disagreement between adherents as to the
tenets of any particular faith or sect. The Committee had regard to the context
in which the claim appeared: the reference to the Shia Twelver’s beliefs was a
brief summary which appeared in a comment piece about Western governments’
stance toward Iran. The main claim in the article, which was explained in the
following paragraph, was about how “urbane Iranians” had influenced Western
governments’ perceptions of the sect’s beliefs, as was emphasised in the
following sentence, which connected these alleged beliefs with the country’s
foreign policy: “With a messianic agenda of the end of days, the fanatics in
Tehran don’t care if a very large number of Iranians are killed in battle or
die of privation.” The Committee considered the passage made sufficiently clear
that, in her earlier reference to the beliefs of Twelvers, the columnist was
focusing on the perspective of the “fanatics in Tehran” who held those beliefs,
while also clearly incorporating the writer’s interpretation of the views held
by the Iranian leadership. Given this, and where the publication had been able
to provide a basis for the description of those beliefs, the Committee did not
find a significant inaccuracy which required correction. There was no breach of
Clause 1 (ii).
Conclusion(s)
12. The
complaint was not upheld.
Remedial
Action Required
13. N/A
Date
complaint received: 22/04/2022
Date
complaint concluded by IPSO: 06/10/2022
Independent
Complaints Reviewer
The complainant complained to the Independent Complaints Reviewer about the process followed by IPSO in handling this complaint. The Independent Complaints Reviewer decided that the process was not flawed and did not uphold the request for review.
Back to ruling listing