Resolution Statement – 29316-20 Kirby v thejc.com
Summary of Complaint
1. Maia Kirby complained to the Independent Press Standards
Organisation that thejc.com breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code
of Practice in an article headlined “'Deeply unpleasant' Chingford Labour
meeting includes open attack on Starmer and claim antisemitism had been
'weaponised'”, published on 1 December 2020.
2. The article reported on a Labour Party meeting. The
article also contained a passage which it alleged was part of an “earlier
message sent to all CLPs by Labour General Secretary Mr Evans”.
3. The complainant said that the article was inaccurate in
breach of Clause 1, as the passage quoted within the article was not sent to
all CLPs, but was an earlier draft of the message. She also said that the draft
contained different information to that which was published.
4. The publication accepted that an error had been made, and
offered to amend the article and add a line clarifying the amendment.
Relevant Code Provisions
Clause 1 (Accuracy)
i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate,
misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not
supported by the text.
ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or
distortion must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and — where
appropriate — an apology published. In cases involving IPSO, due prominence
should be as required by the regulator.
iii) A fair opportunity to reply to significant inaccuracies
should be given, when reasonably called for.
iv) The Press, while free to editorialise and campaign, must
distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.
Mediated Outcome
5. The complaint was not resolved through direct
correspondence between the parties. IPSO therefore began an investigation into
the matter.
6. During IPSO’s investigation, the complainant suggested
the quotation be removed from the article.
7. The publication agreed to remove the quotation.
8. The complainant said that this would resolve the matter
to her satisfaction.
9. As the complaint was successfully mediated, the
Complaints Committee did not make a determination as to whether there had been
any breach of the Code.
Date complaint received: 02/12/2020
Date complaint concluded by IPSO: 15/01/2021
Back to ruling listing