The IPSO arbitration scheme allows you to make a legal claim against titles participating in the scheme. You can make a claim related to libel, slander, malicious falsehood, misuse of private information, breach of confidence, harassment and data protection.
No. IPSO cannot process an arbitration claim whilst a complaint relating to the same issue is ongoing. IPSO reserves the right to close a complaint if you decide to pursue a legal claim relating to the same issue, regardless of whether that claim is pursued via arbitration.
For most claims you will need to pay a small administrative fee of £100. If you choose to use a lawyer, you will also need to cover their fees, but costs can be awarded as part of your claim.
In order for an arbitrator to be appointed and provide a preliminary ruling you will be required to pay an administrative fee of £50.
If you decide to continue to a final ruling you will be required to pay a final ruling fee of £50.
You do not have to use a lawyer but arbitration does require you to advance a legal argument and pursue a claim within a legal framework. Whilst the arbitrator can help by acting in a way that balances the difference of legal knowledge between you and the publisher, you may feel that legal advice or representation is beneficial.
It is your responsibility to assess whether or not you need legal advice or representation and to obtain that advice or representation should you decide you need it. Unfortunately IPSO is unable to give you legal advice relating to your claim.
All national newspapers are part of a compulsory scheme which means they must arbitrate any genuine claim. Members of the voluntary scheme may decide on a case by case basis whether to accept arbitration. If they do not wish to arbitrate your claim you may be able to make a complaint under the Code through IPSO's usual process.
You will be asked to pay an administrative fee in order to pursue arbitration. This fee can be recovered if your claim is successful (i.e. your claim is upheld and the relief granted by the arbitrator is more favourable than an offer previously made by the publisher).
If you engage a lawyer you will have to pay your lawyer’s fees, but may recover a small amount of these costs from the publisher if your claim is successful.
Regardless of the success of your claim you may also recover some fees and costs if the publisher’s conduct warrants such an order.
If your claim is not upheld you will not be asked to pay the publisher’s fees or costs. However, the arbitrator may strike out your claim if they believe your conduct requires that you should repay some of the publisher’s fees or costs or where the claim is wholly without merit, trivial, frivolous or vexatious. If your claim is struck out you will be required to refund to the publisher their fees and may also award some of the publisher’s legal costs against you.
The scheme rules detail the costs and financial risks associated with arbitration in more detail.
If your claim is upheld as part of a final ruling the arbitrator can generally grant the same relief as a court. In particular, the arbitrator can:
Arbitrators cannot grant pre-publication injunctions.
If you want to withdraw your claim you can do so at any point of the process.
However, depending on the stage at which this is done and the Arbitrator’s opinion of your conduct in withdrawing the claim you may have to refund fees or costs to the publisher.
You will not be able to recover the fees which you have already paid if you choose to withdraw after an arbitrator is appointed to your claim. You will remain bound by any ruling already given by the arbitrator if you chose to withdraw.
The time taken to resolve a dispute within the arbitration scheme will largely depend upon the complexity of the claim and the level of party engagement with the process.
In general the arbitrator will aim to complete claims within 90 days of their appointment.
IPSO will make the pre-appointment process as efficient as possible.
No. In general the arbitrator will give a ruling based on written arguments only. You may agree with the publisher to hold an oral hearing if necessary, but you cannot be compelled to use an oral hearing for your claim.
The suitability of arbitration will largely depend upon the circumstances of each claim.
IPSO arbitration, being a fixed-cost and streamlined process, will generally not be suitable if the claim is particularly complex, requires a large amount of disclosure or disclosure from a number of third parties, there is a public interest in having the claim heard in court, or the claim is likely to take a long time to resolve.
The Rules do not preclude you and your lawyer from agreeing to a no win no fee agreement, or CFA. However, in order to make the scheme cost effective for both parties, the Arbitration Agreement requires you to agree not to recover success fees or insurance premiums from the publisher (a common feature of such agreements) so you will need to discuss this with your lawyer before agreeing to arbitrate.
IPSO's complaints process allows complaints under the Editors’ Code to be made to IPSO about any regulated publication, free of charge, and without the need for any agreement. IPSO member publishers are obligated to engage with these complaints and they may result in IPSO’s Complaints Committee requiring the publication to publish its adjudication or a correction.
Arbitration is a process which allows legal claims to be made against a participating publisher and may result in legal remedy, including damages. Both parties will be required to agree to the arbitration process and will be required to pay fees.
Download a list of scheme arbitrators
All documents related to the scheme, including the inquiry form and arbitration agreement form are available here.
IPSO is not able to provide legal advice relating to your claim. For further explanation of the scheme, you can contact email@example.com
IPSO arbitration is available for claims relating to legal matters on the following topics:
The publication of certain statements that cause you harm:
The publication or use of information that is confidential or private:
The unacceptable behaviour of journalists or photographers:
Further details on these are available here